THERE is a renewed move to amend the Constitution, with Speaker Lord Allan Velasco pushing for his Resolution of Both Houses No. 2 seeking to amend the economic provisions of the 1987 Constitution, which replaced the Marcos Constitution that, in turn, had done away with the 1935 Constitution.
Velasco said the county needs constitutional amendments to cushion the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by removing the present constitutional provisions that limit foreign investments, particularly the 40 percent cap on foreign ownership of certain business operations, and the total ban on foreign participation in certain areas like media.
Vice President Leni Robredo, among many others, slammed this new administration push to amend the Constitution at this time when, she said, the nation should be focusing its attention and energies on stopping the pandemic and helping the people who have suffered so much from their loss of income and livelihood.
Actually, this current effort to amend the Constitution dates back to the start of the Duterte administration who wanted a federal form of government, one of his campaign promises. In the ensuing House hearings, congressmen came up with so many other proposals, including limitations on protection of freedom of speech and abolition of many government offices, including the Office of the Vice President, the Ombudsman, and the Judicial and Bar Council.
There was also the perennial self-serving move of officials to abolish term limits, their own and that of the President, who is now limited to six years without reelection. In 1997, the last year of the Ramos administration, there was a People’s Initiative for Reform, Modernization, and Action (PIRMA), which sought amendment of the non-reelection provision for the president. In all succeeding administrations, there were moves to amend the Constitution through various means – Constitutional Convention, Constitutional Assembly, and People’s Initiative.
